And in classic "you can't please everyone" fashion, WHO has been criticized for using an estimation methodology that is overly conservative, i.e., it over-estimates the amount of exposure people were subjected to. Folks are complaining that WHO is encouraging unnecessary panic by saying that people were exposed to more radiation than they likely were.
That sound you're hearing? That is my eyes rolling.
In the end people will still claim that They (whomever "They" are) aren't telling us everything, and are lying to us, and it's really much, much worse than anyone is saying. Because WHO is so well known for lying on matters of health. What do they pay these people for anyway? Oops, there go the eyes again.
I'm a bit tired of people telling me that the top scientists in the field know nothing and are all a bunch of liars, and that the only people who can be relied on are the news media. Can you tell?